Stone-walling low-carb: DAA, AHPRA, and the Diet of Worms.

Posted: March 3, 2017 in American Diabetes Association
Tags: ,

Our 2015 paper, Low-carbohydrate diets as the first approach in the treatment of diabetes. Review and evidence-base, summarized the clinical experience and the research results of the 26 authors. Meant to be a kind of manifesto on theory and practice, the first version of the manuscript was submitted to a couple of major journals under the title “The 15 Theses on…” harking back to Martin Luther’s 95 Theses. A critique of Church practices, particularly indulgences — for a few bucks, we get you or your loved ones out of purgatory — the Theses were supposed to have been nailed by Luther to the door of a church in Wittenberg. Our MS was rejected by BMJ and New England Journal although, like the original 95, it did not seem particularly radical — The American Diabetes Association (ADA) acknowledges that dietary carbohydrate is the major source of high blood glucose and most of our points of evidence were based on pretty solid fact.  Anyway, somebody suggested that we were, in effect, trying to nail our low-carbohydrate paper to the door of the ADA and, in the end, we changed the name to “evidence base” and it was ultimately published.

Until recently, I had not noticed the extensive parallels of the current low-carbohydrate revolution with the Protestant Reformation. The recent imperious and rather savage actions of professional organizations, notably two in Australia, the DAA (Dietitian’s Association of Australia) and AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) in clamping down on their own members for deviation from orthodoxy brought out the similarities. Unlike Luther, who felt that the church really needed his help in getting abuses straightened out, Jennifer Elliott, a dietitian with an established practice of 30 years and Gary Fettke an orthopedic surgeon, thought that they were just doing their job and that, however, non-standard, the low-carbohydrate diets that they recommended for people with diabetes, was far from heresy. Because of the ties between government health agencies, Jennifer ultimately lost her job and Gary is under the bizarre order not to recommend diets to his patients because, as an orthopedic surgeon, there is “nothing associated with your medical training or education that makes you an expert or authority in the field of nutrition, diabetes or cancer.” (Those of us who are actively trying to upgrade the medical curriculum would question which part of the medical profession has such expertise or authority). Dr. Fettke’s training does, however, allow him to perform amputations which have diabetes as its greatest cause, second only to accidents. In any case, offering low-carbohydrate diets to patients has long been perceived as a threat by establishment medicine.  While their claims that they, and they alone, can control the epidemics of obesity and diabetes has been at the level of offering reduction of time in purgatory.  The medical establishment has been intolerant of criticism but has largely responded by delaying or preventing publication and by refusing to fund research that might get the “wrong” answer. The direct attacks on practitioners is new. There are several instances but the Australian cases distinctly represent desperation.


Luther at the Diet of Worms.

History of religion remains one of the gaps in my undergraduate liberal education and I was unfamiliar with the dramatic events surrounding Luther’s mission. The sixteenth century was a brutish time and I should have guessed how violent and oppressive would have been the response of the Catholic Church to Luther’s suggestions for improvement. After all, if you insisted on the word of the Bible rather than the word of priests, indeed, if you wanted direct access to a Bible in your own language rather than in Latin, then everybody could be their own savior. Being burnt at the stake was standard punishment for such heresy. We all know about Galileo’s brutal treatment and his being forced to recant his heliocentric theories, although at some point, he supposedly muttered, under his breath, “eppur se muove.” (It (the earth) does move anyway). That was almost a century after Luther’s protest and the danger was even greater in 1521. Luther, however, was a madman and refused to recant. Ultimately, he faced a trial at the Diet of Worms. (Contrary to popular opinion, “Diet” is an English word and means assembly; the German is Reichstag; Worms is in Germany, about 60 kilometres from Frankfurt-am-Main, and is pronounced “Vorms,” to rhyme with “norms,” but the joke is widely made, even by Shakespeare: see end of this post). At The Diet, Luther got off because a unanimous vote was required for conviction. He had an inside man, Frederick the Wise, the elector (as local political leaders were known) in his province.  Frederick seems to have thought that Luther was good for tourism (and probably helped get the Church off his own back). Of course,“not guilty,” doesn’t mean innocent and, as for sex-offenders in our day, you could get killed in the street anyway and the authorities would understand. To protect him, Frederick had Luther “kidnapped,” disguised as an aristocrat with the alias Junker Jörg and he went to the mattresses in a Castle in Wartburg for a year until it all blew over. Lucas Cranach the Elder painted a portrait of Jörg, possibly to let followers know that Luther was still alive.

575707-1449742854         Junker Jörg aka Martin Luther.

Heresy down under

So what had the Australian health professionals done to arouse the wrath of the “Church”? Not much. Jennifer Elliott has more than 30 years of experience and is the author of the excellent book, Baby Boomers, Bellies & Blood Sugars  which is distinguished by its straight-forward practical approach and does not seem to tweak anybody’s beard. In fact, she was not really accused of any specific thing although the message was clear: low-carbohydrate high fat (LCHF) diets are forbidden. Trying to help out, I sent an email message to Claire Hewat, head of DAA. I attached the twelve-points of evidence paper and I explained our position. I pointed out that “Ms. Elliott seems quite upset and genuinely puzzled since carbohydrate restriction has been a treatment for diabetes more or less forever, certainly going back to Elliott Joslin (early twentieth century physician and authority on diabetes).”

hewat_claire11474634995-300x224        Claire Hewat, head of DAA.

I mentioned an interview with a reporter from the New York Times who could not understand the resistance to an established, successful and ultimately obvious therapy — you don’t give carbohydrates to people with a disease of carbohydrate intolerance — and I made the case that the burden of proof should be on anyone who didn’t approve. I suggested a discussion, “perhaps an online webinar, in which all sides present their case. I and/or my colleagues would be glad to participate.” Claire’s answer was that I was “obviously not in possession of all the facts in this matter, nor can I apprise you of them as this is part of a confidential complaints process …nor is DAA afraid of debate but this is not the place for it.”

Not to digress too much, I loved the idea that I did not have the facts right but the facts were not available because they were confidential. It reminded me of watching a scene in one of the old Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes movies. Holmes is playing the violin and his arch-enemy, Professor Moriarity suddenly appears in the doorway:

Moriarity: “Holmes, I’ve come to….Well, I am sure that you can deduce why I’ve come.”

Holmes: “Yes. And I’m sure you can deduce my answer.”

Moriarity: “So that’s final?”

Holmes: “I’m afraid so.”

Most distressing remains the fact that DAA constitutes a professional dietitians’ organization which should, as in Macbeth, “against his murderer shut the door, / Not bear the knife myself.” (Is this a DAAger I see before me?)

The details of Jennifer’s case are buried in evasive legal double-talk but the precipitating events make it clear that censure derives from her recommending low-carbohydrate diets to her patients with diabetes. Claire Hewat’s defense against this obvious lack of due process was that Jennifer was invited to appear before an inquiry, set up somewhat along the lines of the Diet of Worms, but Jennifer refused to appear. In fact, it would have been worse than the Diet in that there were no formal charges and even Luther had been afforded legal representation. There would certainly be no defenders, as Luther had in Frederick, the Wise. Most important, recanting was not an option — if it wasn’t about anything real, there was nothing to recant. (Like Luther, she probably would not have felt able to recant anyway). Jennifer declined to attend telling Claire that it appeared to be “an invitation to a beheading.” The net effect is that she lost her job and and legal recourse would likely be exorbitant.

The words

In the reformation, heresy might have meant simply owning a Bible in your native language, or really owning any Bible at all. The Church held onto the Latin versions which you did not get to see directly. Somewhat like governmental nutritional guidelines in our tme, it was not in your native language, and required an “expert” priest to tell you what’s what. The first English translation was accomplished by John Wycliffe and during the English Reformation, several people were actually executed for owning a Wycliffe Bible. I found it somewhat analogous to the persistent hatred of Dr. Atkins so long after his death, that, at some point, the Church in England had Wycliffe’s body exhumed and burnt at the stake.

Ultimately, Luther succeeded because of Gutenberg and the invention of movable type. Now you did not have to make copies by hand. Now Luther could really get the word out. And he wrote the word. During his period of lying low in Wartburg, he translated the Bible into German.  And he published it. It was a big hit although the German population recognized that they had been swindled — financially as well as theologically — and history records a Peasant’s Revolt which was put down with great brutality. We recognize in all this parallels to what is really going on in the establishment’s determination to repress LCHF diets. And everybody recognizes the analog of Gutenberg’s press.

Unser Gutenberg  and the Fettke case

Our Gutenberg is, of course, the internet where technical and scientific writings, once the province of specialists, can now be viewed by many and where they can be discussed widely. Publishers of many journals try to maintain pay-walls in keeping with somebody’s observation that publishers’ function used to be to make new information available while now they work to make information unavailable.  (Many simultaneously cash in on open access which charges the authors outrageous fees). Whether the availability of scientific facts is out-weighed by proliferation of alternative facts is open to question but, on balance, we have a view, not only of the science, but of the inner workings of the health agencies that might otherwise be visible to only a few. And that’s how we have extensive access to the Fettke case and an associated Diet convened by the Australian Senate.

As reported by Marika Sboros, Fettke “cannot tell patients not to eat sugar. Why not? Because the country’s medical regulatory body, Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority (AHPRA), says so….It has been investigating Fettke for more than two years now. That was after the first anonymous complaint from a DAA dietitian in 2014. Earlier this year,  AHPRA told Fettke to stop talking about nutrition until it had decided on a suitable sanction.” and — I’m not making this up — “informed Fettke that it was investigating him for ‘inappropriately reversing (a patient’s) type 2 diabetes…’”

Dr. Gary Fettke testified at an Australian Senate Inquiry on November 1. and just “by coincidence,” a few hours later, AHPRA’s 2 1/2 year investigation came to an end and Fettke was told that he would be constrained from giving nutritional advice.  In the end, this did not sit well with the Senate which undertook further hearing interrogating Martin Fletcher, the CEO of APHRA.

“Haven’t you got better things to do?”

You can see Martin Fletcher trying to defend AHPRA’s actions.  on Youtube. At 31:25, one of the Senators asked “…if a health practitionerr is advising a patient to go on a … sensible, medically-accepted diet program, why would you risk-assess that and have all guns blazing? Haven’t you got better things to do?”

One of life’s great disappointments is that when you finally corner the bad guys, they turn out to be pathetic like Saddam Hussein. They don’t break down on the stand as in the old Perry Mason episodes. It is sad but it is also hard to feel much sympathy.


Martin Fletcher, CEO of AHPRA trying to juggle the truth at the Senate hearing.

“Bread thou art…”

It was a trip to Rome, intended to deepen his faith, that ultimately contributed to Luther’s transformation. He saw corruption on a grand scale but what really freaked him out was that corruption and vice were coupled with a cynical disregard for religious practice. A priest going through the motions of giving the elements in the sacrament  muttered to himself “Bread thou art, and bread thou shalt remain; wine thou art, and wine thou shalt remain.”

That becomes the most distressing feature of this analogy. The quotation above, “There is nothing associated with your medical training or education that makes you an expert or authority in the field of nutrition, diabetes or cancer,” comes from a letter to Dr. Fettke that continued “Even if, in the future, your views on the benefits of the LCHF lifestyle become the accepted best medical practice, this does not change the fundamental fact that you are not suitably trained or educated as a medical practitioner to be providing advice or recommendations on this topic as a medical practitioner.”

This statement that treating disease is less important than loyalty to political power stands as the greatest exposition of the need for Reformation in Medicine.

Appendix. Shakespeare on the Diet of Worms.

Hamlet has been charged by his father’s Ghost with avenging the father’s murder by Claudius, the current king. Hamlet has put on an “antic disposition” to hide his motives. At one point, mistaking him for the King, Hamlet kills Polonius, a pompous court official, who is hiding behind a wall-hanging. The king hears about it and is pissed and wants to know where the body is (Act 4,Scene 3):

CLAUDIUS: Where’s Polonius?

HAMLET: At supper.

CLAUDIUS: At supper where?

HAMLET: Not where he eats, but where he is eaten. A certain convocation of politic worms are e’en [now] at him. Your worm is your only emperor for diet. We fat all creatures else to fat us, and we fat ourselves for maggots. Your fat king and your lean beggar is but variable service—two dishes, but to one table. That’s the end.

CLAUDIUS: Alas, alas!

HAMLET: A man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm.

CLAUDIUS: What dost thou mean by this?

HAMLET: Nothing but to show you how a king may go a progress through the guts of a beggar.

CLAUDIUS: Where is Polonius?

HAMLET: In heaven. Send hither to see. If your messenger find him not there, seek him i’ th’ other place yourself. But if indeed you find him not within this month, you shall nose him as you go up the stairs into the lobby.

CLAUDIUS (to attendants) Go seek him there.

(Exeunt some attendants)

HAMLET: He will stay till ye come.

  1. Marilyn says:

    Timely. 2017 marks the 500th anniversary of the Lutheran Reformation.

  2. Ward says:

    Outstanding post.

  3. […] Source: Stone-walling low-carb: DAA, APHA, and the Diet of Worms. | Richard David Feinman […]

  4. Marilyn says:

    Good for you! Great blog. To my mind, this dietitian thing is definitely a case of the tail wagging the dog.

  5. John Firth says:

    Great post Richard, very entertaining I just hope it reaches those who need to read it.

  6. goransjoberg2015 says:

    Yes – it’s disgusting!

    Our Annika Dahlqvist though survived in Sweden 2008 and Low Was approved. The resistance is though in all NHS walls.

    Unfortunately I couldn’t open the YouTube file.

    Dark forces in action?

    Keep fighting!

    Dr. Göran Sjöberg

    > 3 mars 2017 kl. 16:58 skrev Richard David Feinman : > >

  7. Eugene Fine says:

    It’s superb. Couple of typos but I can’t locate them right now.


  8. michael goroncy says:

    I very much like the way you presented this post..Richard.
    The combined analogies ‘Medicine, Politics, History/Theology and Literature’.

    A nice soup to frustrate the shit out of people that clearly see the madness.

    Will put a different slant on this. So! That it doesn’t disrupt my inner calmness and send me into a passionate tizz of frustration/anger.

    (1) A few decades ago, it was a matter of letting ‘the old brigade’ die and let new blood create a frontier of something that is less polluted. That theory failed miserably.
    (2) For the many MD’s and Medico’s that have been threatened with ‘ litigation and being struck off’ is there a way around this?.
    For instance: Can they phrase their advice in a way that can keep them safe. Like: “ The ADA and AHA advice is as such. But I believe that with your health problems, and if I was facing the same…this is what I would do. Doesn’t matter which. Plant based, LCHF, Keto. You would think there is a way to enable advice without ‘sword fighting’ with the establishment. The individual cannot beat them on their own terms. Even though the ADA and AHA are resposible for more deaths than ‘Pol-Pot’.
    (3) This is the best: The people that seek the truth will go searching and researching. They care enough about their health to put in a affort and make their own choices. The rest are a total wast of time and energy. They want a quick fix (silver bullet) and just say “Give me sumth’n”.
    (4) BTW: The question of Hamlet’s “TO BE OR NOT TO BE” = SUICIDE. To exist or not to exist.

    • rdfeinman says:

      On “For the many MD’s and Medico’s that have been threatened with ‘ litigation and being struck off’ is there a way around this?”

      I don’t think it is really a problem. These acts of hostility are indictors of desperation and in the narrow confines of professional organization. The really is no legal risk. In fact, at some point people with diabetes who should have been offered low-carb will sue the practitioners. This is simply the Twilight of the Lipophobes.

  9. Bruce Miller says:

    As an insulin dependent diabetic who went un DX’d for nearly 13 years (was finally DX in 2008) once I discovered Dr. Richard K. Bernstein’s book Diabetes Solution that completely explains the Low-Carbohydrate Solution it was a no brainer for me as a conservation ecologist. Now only 6,12,12 grams of carbs for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and now a minimal need for fast acting insulin.

  10. Paula Nedved says:

    Great post Richard, perhaps your finest ever. This topic of topics of course is just the thing to bring out everything you’ve got. This is easy for me to say, but I wish Gary Fettke would just do the Rosa Parks thing. “Move? Yeah? Make me.”

    • rdfeinman says:

      I think that that is his general strategy but they’re doing it to themselves. I think that they will get few allies in the medical profession and, in any case, the wall is down. Like CSIRO, many are already scrambling to save face.

  11. michael goroncy says:

    Yo! Richard
    “The really is no legal risk. In fact, at some point people with diabetes who should have been offered low-carb will sue the practitioners”.

    This ain’t ever going to happen.
    But! What can happen ‘short-term’ is the ‘Trumpsters’ radical change within the FDA.
    At least in the USA, it has the potential to be a ‘free for all’. If the FDA follows through with it’s protocol of ‘The efficacy of drugs don’t need proof’……This will wipe out any strength that the ADA, AHA and other grant whore parasites may have.
    Interesting times.

  12. Jim Jozwiak says:

    The Lutheran most important to me was J. S. Bach, and I wish I could go back in time to tell him how he might fix his diabetes so he could have finished Art of the Fugue.

  13. Richard says:

    It’s a great parallel to draw – dietary advice and religion. You could take it even further and make the point that certain “diets” and their leaders are “cult” like creating followers that unquestioningly accept their word as gospel – a current example being the “clean eating” fad currently doing the rounds.
    In the same vein, it’s interesting to ponder on the motives of the establishment. One could theorise at length (I’m sure some would argue conspiracies abound) but there is a simple question that gets lost in all of the noise;
    If an approach, no matter how empirically unproven it might be, but none the less in the real world works, why not embrace it.
    anotber way of looking at this would be – You the establishment have been at the forefront of medical and nutritional advice for the past 50 years and have overseen/perpetrated the single largest man made pandemic that is obesity. In engineering terms “you are not part of the solution” as such “you are part of the problem”.
    That’s all good, but if you are an obese individual, and want to get a grip of your problem who do you trust, when everyone that purports to be an expert on the matter appears to have their own personal/commercial agenda!!!

  14. Angie Gillman says:

    Well thank you for some entertainment this Saturday morning…….but the seriousness of your message is all too clear,low carb high fat intake is the way forward for all of us but especially diabetics.
    My husband is a type 2 diabetic who followed the “NHS dietary advice” and has continued to maintain his weight,required insulin medication and develop retinopathy 8years into the disease.
    I discovered Diabetes Solution and The 8week blood fasting diet by Dr Michael Mosley and after sharing this discovery with his diabetic consultant,we embarked on a low carb, high fat, low calorie diet. Result: Weight loss! Reduction in insulin! More energy! It’s going to be a longer process to get the retinopathy into remission but it can be done.
    I’m incensed to learn that in 2014 Scotland health board changed their dietary advice for diabetics to a lchf diet but as yet England and Wales have not. It’s a disgrace as the hclf diets are creating the epidemic of obesity and diabetes type 2 and the other debilitating conditions that inevitably follow.
    Is there another agenda? Killing off the NHS, or could it be people?

    • rdfeinman says:

      Thanks for sharing this story. I wish you luck in further therapy. Although the post is ironic, I was serious about the Gutenberg-internet idea. You can write to the NHS and ask for an explanation. You can copy your message and their answer to me and it will be part of our effort to bring this kind of thing to light. If you are polite and serious, they have to answer you. As for motivation, there is Hanlon’s Razor which says that you should not invoke malice until you’ve excluded stupidity.

  15. Indy51 says:

    Should be interesting to see how the dietitians in Australia react to the latest research by CSIRO and the new low carb diet they plan on introducing – given that CSIRO are one of the most well-regarded scientific bodies in our country:

    I’d love to watch Hewat’s head explode over this new development!

  16. Ken Strain says:

    The video is revealing, and nicely brings people to Gary Fettke’s youtube profile.

    The youtube link shows up in my browser as https://https// i.e. there are some extra characters at the start.

    The video is titled “Community Affairs 20161122” which should allow a search.

  17. A minor correction, Richard: Worms is in the Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, on the banks of the Upper Rhine about 60 kilometres from Frankfurt-am-Main.
    Apart from that, more strength to your elbow!

  18. Craig says:

    Thank you for an excellent essay! Entertaining, erudite, elegant.

    I am a little puzzled by the idea of a group of doctors who by their own prescription lack dietary training, being thought capable of judging that same lack in one of their colleagues .. ?

    • rdfeinman says:

      Following the Gutenberg line in the post, it is reasonable for you to write to AHPRA and ask that question. I would ask, not tell. The question is what training, course-work, etc. is given to those doctors who can give nutritional advice. Formal training in nutrition is generally the same in medical schools for all MDs. Be polite and focussed.

  19. Hannah Sutter says:

    The best summary ever. Religion and Diet have always had a close relationship not only is the word Diet used in non food events but I must admit that I have often equated the gospel of Richard Feinman to the gospel of Paul. As you know we only had conversion to christianity in the UK when the early christians allowed the pagans to celebrate xmas at the same time as thier midwinter feast.. The problem for us Jews is that we do not believe in the whole conversion shit which makes us very poor communicators.

    Personally I think the Unwins of this world will win in the end with their watered down version which allows the establishment a get out of jail card and gives them the impression that they were right all along. Shame but probably true

    On 3 March 2017 at 15:58, Richard David Feinman wrote:

    > rdfeinman posted: “Our 2015 paper, Low-carbohydrate diets as the first > approach in the treatment of diabetes. Review and evidence-base, summarized > the clinical experience and the research results of the 26 authors. Meant > to be a kind of manifesto on theory and practice, the” >

    • rdfeinman says:

      I myself adhere to John’s advise not to speak with an uncertain trumpet. On the Jewish end, there is Woody Allen’s Tales of the Hasidic Masters which describes a famous Rabbi of Poland who is said to have inspired many pogroms with his sense of humor.

    • Paula Nedved says:

      Story: Had my daughter’s Jewish boyfriend’s family over for the holidays. Them at the door: Happy Christmas. Me: Uh, Merry Hanukkah.

      “Personally I think the Unwins of this world will win in the end with their watered down version which allows the establishment a get out of jail card and gives them the impression that they were right all along. Shame but probably true.” As you know, Richard calls this probable scenario, with his usual erudite panache, “Slouching towards low carb” (with apologies to Yeats).

      And by the way, Paul did not have a gospel. 🙂 Just sayin…

  20. michael goroncy says:

    The cavalry has arrived!
    Well, not quite, but a heavyweight has stepped into the ring.
    Salim (President of the World Heart Federation) Yusuf.

    Although not a ‘trained dietician’….like the ‘gnarl y/teenage’ girls that give nutritional advice.
    Dr Yusuf is to be applauded for his courage.

    Also read the comments in the above link. Where ‘our people’ talk to ‘their people’.

    Here is a clip of Yusuf:

  21. docww says:

    Richard–It seems that you have too much free time. I love your musings but sometimes they float away from my field of vision.I am currently at our condo in Mazatlan Mexico, a truly wonderful place. My wife is Greek and we have a home south of Athens but I call Mazatlan our “cheap Greece”. They have wonderful weather, fantastic fresh food and lovely people. Of course there is a down side. Their grocery stores are starting to look like our grocery stores and Mexicans are the number one consumers of Coke in the world. They now have a horrible obesity epidemic and nobody seems to know why. Even the beggars on the street seem to by carrying a two litter bottle of coke. Yes indeed, we do have our work cut out for us.

  22. sashawcforum says:

    hi Prof Richard, thanks a ton for your brilliant email critique of the persecution of Banting supporters .

    I ran into Tim Noakes at a quiet Sunday garden lunch the other week, and was delighted to hear from him and his wife how confident they are of winning the battle against our persecutors via our Dietetics and Medical mafiosi here and in Australia and USA and UK etc.. .

    But right is not might; and like Hamlet, we are likely to go on losing the war until a generation passes. such was the murder of Ignaz Semmelweis by his peers in Vienna, and the US suppression of eg lithium and metformin and medical cannabis for decades,and the assassination of prof Sir Jock Drummond and his family by Big Pharma in ~1952 in France for successfully .promoting vitamins for health over big pharma designer drugs.. Linus Pauling and Galileo were persecuted for broadcasting truth but … .



    *Dr Neil D Burman MBChB (UCT 1966), MRCP(UK 1974),* Specialist / Family Integrative Physician*.** MP 0113980. Pr No 1802909 *

    *ph 021 6717797 (6am-21pm) PO Box 2682 Clareinch 7740 South Africa . * * ; personal +27836299160 . fax+27865657215 * * **NedBank ac 1025215540*

    rdfeinman posted: “Our 2015 paper, Low-carbohydrate diets as the first approach in the treatment of diabetes. Review and evidence-base, summarized the clinical experience and the research results of the 26 authors. Meant to be a kind of manifesto on theory and practice, the”

  23. lmyaxley says:

    Richard, You might be amused by the following story about a fake doctor having slipped passed APHRA. Police hunt Œfake¹ doctor as Health Minister can¹t say if the impostor performed surgery ho-treated-patients-for-11-years-with-stolen-qualifications/news-story/c24bf 74be2a6e5c2a8a99e9e4474922a

    I guess APHRA didn’t catch this guy because they were too busy reprimanding legitimate doctors for giving dietary advice.

    Leigh Yaxley

    From: Richard David Feinman Reply-To: Richard David Feinman Date: Friday, 3 March 2017 11:58 PM To: LEIGH YAXLEY Subject: [New post] Stone-walling low-carb: DAA, APHA, and the Diet of Worms. rdfeinman posted: “Our 2015 paper, Low-carbohydrate diets as the first approach in the treatment of diabetes. Review and evidence-base, summarized the clinical experience and the research results of the 26 authors. Meant to be a kind of manifesto on theory and practice, the”

  24. Marilyn says:

    It has ever been thus, I guess. Even the earliest low carb diet book was stone-walled. This according to Dr. Barry Groves:

    “When Banting’s booklet, in which he described the diet and its amazing results, was published, it was so contrary to the established doctrine that it set up a howl of protest among members of the medical profession. The “Banting Diet” became the center of a bitter controversy and Banting’s papers and book were ridiculed and distorted. No one could deny that the diet worked, but as a layman had published it—and medical men were anxious that their position in society should not be undermined—they felt bound to attack it. Banting’s paper was criticized solely on the grounds that it was “unscientific.”

    “Later, Dr. Harvey had a problem too. He had an effective treatment for obesity but not a convincing theory to explain it. As he was a medical man, and so easier for the other members of his profession to attack, he came in for a great deal of ridicule until, in the end, his practice began to suffer.”

  25. SL says:

    Richard….one of the best things I have read for a while ! Terrific! – Steve

  26. Marilyn says:

    It would be fun to see a comparison between and all meat diet and a vegan diet, with neither using processed foods nor supplements. Except perhaps some salt.

  27. Lori says:

    It is a great article. My question, why in 2017 do we talk about diet (other than those related to religious groups) as a matter of belief? Macros should be a function of research and scientific fact not bias. While some experts are motivated by money or other inducements, I would like to think most are motivated by what they think is the best diet. Yet there seems to be no absolute standard.

    As a lay person, it seems to me that the very low fat high unrefined carb diet does work (if you can stick to it) ala Pritikin and Ornish to control or reverse T2D and CAD and obesity. Whether it requires meditation and exercise as confounding variable is not a huge factor for me as long as it works. The fact there are legitimate studies showing a high carb diet reverses T2D does amaze me (Duke Rice Diet anyone?) What is the mechanism there since to me it seems like giving alcohol to an alcoholic.

    The LCMPHF/Keto/Atkins diet using whole foods (as opposed to diet bars) works as well. I realize they are not always identical diets.

    I have personally been following a LCHF diet for the last month or so and have seen good results but I must admit there is still a part of me that wonders if I should be having that high fat cream in my morning coffee. I am ok with the coconut oil and the avocados and olive oil but the saturated fat makes me wonder. It does bother me that for every expert and every study advocating a keto diet there is one advocating an Ornish diet and everything in between.

    The one thing that does not seem to work is keeping your carbs at 60 per meal and eating >10-30% fat which is what most MDs would suggest. In this case for anyone who is not a normal weight 18 year old, moderation does not seem to be the key. Some serious education needs to take place for most physicians. I think the problem for the average physician is that the standard of care is to give statins or metformin and to put the patient on a moderate carb low fat diet (anyone else upset about that commercial for diabetes medication where the woman is at Sunday dinner and passes up the meatballs in favor of the pasta?!) The standard of care is not to put them on a keto diet without medication (I realize that meds and keto are not mutually exclusive). So if anything happens, even if the patient is hit by a car, the doctor is potentially liable. You follow the standard of care, even if you get a bad result, you are not liable

  28. Vince Harris says:

    Great read. 👍
    Well pieced together.
    Funny & pathetic in equal measure.

  29. James DownUnder says:

    Humour, pathos, literature and a commentary on Good Science. – What’s not to like about this ?

Leave a Reply to rdfeinman Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s